And, how many more like him have been silenced?

BRITISH MANAGEMENT

The London-based firm AMEC, ranked by Engineering News Record magazine as the world s largest firm , oversaw the actual management of the debris removal at both the Pentagon and the WTC.

AMEC was the only construction company working at both disaster sites, the company’s website says, AMEC is managing Hudson River barging operations to transport the rubble from the entire WTC site to a landfill on Staten Island and to steel recycling operations in New Jersey.

AMEC had just finished the renovation at the Pentagon when it was called to manage the removal of debris there and at the World Trade Center.

AMEC was placed in charge [by the City of New York] of organizing and engineering the around-the-clock clean up operation in the northwest sector, the website says, which included the North Tower and 6 WTC (U.S. Customs House).

The company also cleaned up the 47-story WTC 7, which mysteriously collapsed late in the afternoon of 911.

AMEC co-managed the WTC site with another London-based firm, Bovis Lend Lease, from January 2002.

Bovis was a somewhat troubled construction subsidiary of Britain s P&O, which was taken over by Australia s Lend Lease Corp in 1999.

Sir Frank Lampl, a Czechoslovakian who emigrated to England at age 42, heads Bovis.

Lampl, who claims to have been imprisoned in Auschwitz and Dachau during the Nazi era, is also a British knight.

Mary Costello, spokesperson for Bovis in New York, told AFP that the company had assumed overall responsibility for the WTC site on Jan 4, 2002.

She didn t want to discuss what buildings Bovis had worked on and said, “You should not be contacting us”. You should be speaking to DDC, Costello said. Calls to DDC public affairs department are neither answered nor returned.

Turner Construction, the third foreign firm, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hochtief AG, headquartered in Essen, Germany. Turner was unwilling to discuss its role at the WTC site.

AMEC & THE PENTAGON

AMEC is an informal acronym for Asset Management and Engineering Consultancy, according to the firm s communications director David Paterson.

Paterson told AFP that oil and gas extraction provides 25 percent of the company s revenue.

AMEC operates the North Sea oilrigs for Shell and British Petroleum, Paterson said.

AMEC had just completed a project to strengthen and renovate a section of the Pentagon, Wedge 1, when the building was attacked. The damaged area is between Wedges 1 and 2.

Marcella Diaz, communication director for the firm s U.S. subsidiary, AMEC Construction Management, told AFP that the companys work on the Pentagon had been completed on the Friday before Sept. 11.

When AFP asked how AMEC responded to criticism that crucial evidence from the WTC had been improperly disposed of, Diaz said, “It’s the first time I’ve heard such criticism.”

Paterson told AFP that AMEC is the prime contractor for the U.S. Department of Defense on environmental work.

The firm was paid some $752 million for its 2-year renovation and clean up at the Pentagon, according to Rachel Decker, spokesperson for the Pentagon’s renovation entity known as PENREN.

The fact that a British firm had been given the contract to renovate the Pentagon was not a problem, Decker said.

CITY OF NEW YORK

Asked about who was in charge of the clean up at the WTC, Paterson said, The City of New York was the project manager. The director of DDC, Kenneth Holden, was the person in charge at the site, Paterson said.

AMEC is in line for further construction work at both the Pentagon and the World Trade Center according to the Daily Mail.

The company s London-based chief executive, Sir Peter Mason said about the Pentagon clean up,

The target is to have it reopened for business by Sept. 11, 2003, as a point of principle.

Sir Peter Mason is a Knight of the British Empire.

The former mayor of New York, Rudolph Giuliani, who gave the management of the WTC site to the two British firms, AMEC and Bovis Lend Lease, received an honorary knighthood in the Order of the British Empire from Queen Elizabeth II on Feb. 13, 2002.

Thanks to Conspiracy Planet and the incredible Christopher Bollyn

Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves, by artificial ties, in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.

~ George Washington

 Farewell Address to the Free People of the United States

In my first entry, I discussed who stood to benefit from the 9/11 attacks and how it came to be that the United States was led to war in Afghanistan. I’m not even going to get into the fact that the official story we were fed about that day was an utter and total lie. A lie of such magnitude that it can only be classified under the category of mass mind control.  If you are here, I will assume that you already know this or suspect it. For those who are so inclined, any of the posts here can be confirmed with further research, using your own deductive reasoning, and drawing your own conclusions.

Following up on my previous contention that foreign powers have a motivation in manipulating America to go war – war that is for their benefit, not ours – I’m going share with you an amazing speech from 1941. When I came across this I was struck by how the same actors have been at it for so long. Worse yet is the fact that we, Americans, have been brainwashed into believing that these actors are our “allies”. I’m speaking, specifically, of Great Britain. When exactly was it that Americans forgot who their forefathers fought a revolution against? My knowledge of history is both pretty good and much too superficial, so maybe you can enlighten me.

I suspect that our original enemy has always been so. From the American revolution to the present, I am of the opinion that Great Britain has never ceased  in its efforts to undermine, infiltrate, and use the United States. In my first entry, I presented why I thought they were central to the 9/11 attacks and what their motive was. Now, I would like to travel back in time to further establish their malevolent influence and interference in American politics and foreign policy.

The following was spoken by a true American patriot – a man who was maligned, lied about, called a traitor and a  Nazi sympathizer – all because he dared to say that Britain’s interests were not ours. He correctly argued that America would lose its independence and sovereignty if allowed to become a tool of the very same power our founders fought to free us from.  That man was Charles Lindbergh. Notice that the culprits he identified as working to drag us into their war, are the same ones the evidence points to being behind 9/11. And, notice the date of his speech!

Des Moines Speech: Delivered in Des Moines, Iowa, on September 11, 1941

It is now two years since this latest European war began. From that day in September, 1939, until the present moment, there has been an over-increasing effort to force the United States into the conflict.

That effort has been carried on by foreign interests, and by a small minority of our own people; but it has been so successful that, today, our country stands on the verge of war.

At this time, as the war is about to enter its third winter, it seems appropriate to review the circumstances that have led us to our present position. Why are we on the verge of war? Was it necessary for us to become so deeply involved? Who is responsible for changing our national policy from one of neutrality and independence to one of entanglement in European affairs?

Personally, I believe there is no better argument against our intervention than a study of the causes and developments of the present war. I have often said that if the true facts and issues were placed before the American people, there would be no danger of our involvement.

Here, I would like to point out to you a fundamental difference between the groups who advocate foreign war, and those who believe in an independent destiny for America.

If you will look back over the record, you will find that those of us who oppose intervention have constantly tried to clarify facts and issues; while the interventionists have tried to hide facts and confuse issues.

We ask you to read what we said last month, last year, and even before the war began. Our record is open and clear, and we are proud of it.

We have not led you on by subterfuge and propaganda. We have not resorted to steps short of anything, in order to take the American people where they did not want to go.

What we said before the elections, we say [illegible] and again, and again today. And we will not tell you tomorrow that it was just campaign oratory. Have you ever heard an interventionist, or a British agent, or a member of the administration in Washington ask you to go back and study a record of what they have said since the war started? Are their self-styled defenders of democracy willing to put the issue of war to a vote of our people? Do you find these crusaders for foreign freedom of speech, or the removal of censorship here in our own country?

The subterfuge and propaganda that exists in our country is obvious on every side. Tonight, I shall try to pierce through a portion of it, to the naked facts which lie beneath.

When this war started in Europe, it was clear that the American people were solidly opposed to entering it. Why shouldn’t we be? We had the best defensive position in the world; we had a tradition of independence from Europe; and the one time we did take part in a European war left European problems unsolved, and debts to America unpaid.

National polls showed that when England and France declared war on Germany, in 1939, less than 10 percent of our population favored a similar course for America. But there were various groups of people, here and abroad, whose interests and beliefs necessitated the involvement of the United States in the war. I shall point out some of these groups tonight, and outline their methods of procedure. In doing this, I must speak with the utmost frankness, for in order to counteract their efforts, we must know exactly who they are.

The three most important groups who have been pressing this country toward war are the British, the Jewish and the Roosevelt administration.

Behind these groups, but of lesser importance, are a number of capitalists, Anglophiles, and intellectuals who believe that the future of mankind depends upon the domination of the British empire. Add to these the Communistic groups who were opposed to intervention until a few weeks ago, and I believe I have named the major war agitators in this country.

I am speaking here only of war agitators, not of those sincere but misguided men and women who, confused by misinformation and frightened by propaganda, follow the lead of the war agitators.

As I have said, these war agitators comprise only a small minority of our people; but they control a tremendous influence. Against the determination of the American people to stay out of war, they have marshaled the power of their propaganda, their money, their patronage.

Let us consider these groups, one at a time.

First, the British: It is obvious and perfectly understandable that Great Britain wants the United States in the war on her side. England is now in a desperate position. Her population is not large enough and her armies are not strong enough to invade the continent of Europe and win the war she declared against Germany.

Her geographical position is such that she cannot win the war by the use of aviation alone, regardless of how many planes we send her. Even if America entered the war, it is improbable that the Allied armies could invade Europe and overwhelm the Axis powers. But one thing is certain. If England can draw this country into the war, she can shift to our shoulders a large portion of the responsibility for waging it and for paying its cost.

As you all know, we were left with the debts of the last European war; and unless we are more cautious in the future than we have been in the past, we will be left with the debts of the present case. If it were not for her hope that she can make us responsible for the war financially, as well as militarily, I believe England would have negotiated a peace in Europe many months ago, and be better off for doing so.

England has devoted, and will continue to devote every effort to get us into the war. We know that she spent huge sums of money in this country during the last war in order to involve us. Englishmen have written books about the cleverness of its use.

We know that England is spending great sums of money for propaganda in America during the present war. If we were Englishmen, we would do the same. But our interest is first in America; and as Americans, it is essential for us to realize the effort that British interests are making to draw us into their war.

The second major group I mentioned is the Jewish.

It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race.

No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them. Instead of agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way for they will be among the first to feel its consequences.

Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastations. A few far-sighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not.

Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.

I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races, I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.

We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.

The Roosevelt administration is the third powerful group which has been carrying this country toward war. Its members have used the war emergency to obtain a third presidential term for the first time in American history. They have used the war to add unlimited billions to a debt which was already the highest we have ever known. And they have just used the war to justify the restriction of congressional power, and the assumption of dictatorial procedures on the part of the president and his appointees.

The power of the Roosevelt administration depends upon the maintenance of a wartime emergency. The prestige of the Roosevelt administration depends upon the success of Great Britain to whom the president attached his political future at a time when most people thought that England and France would easily win the war. The danger of the Roosevelt administration lies in its subterfuge. While its members have promised us peace, they have led us to war heedless of the platform upon which they were elected.

In selecting these three groups as the major agitators for war, I have included only those whose support is essential to the war party. If any one of these groups–the British, the Jewish, or the administration–stops agitating for war, I believe there will be little danger of our involvement.

I do not believe that any two of them are powerful enough to carry this country to war without the support of the third. And to these three, as I have said, all other war groups are of secondary importance.

When hostilities commenced in Europe, in 1939, it was realized by these groups that the American people had no intention of entering the war. They knew it would be worse than useless to ask us for a declaration of war at that time. But they believed that this country could be entered into the war in very much the same way we were entered into the last one.

They planned: first, to prepare the United States for foreign war under the guise of American defense; second, to involve us in the war, step by step, without our realization; third, to create a series of incidents which would force us into the actual conflict. These plans were of course, to be covered and assisted by the full power of their propaganda.

Our theaters soon became filled with plays portraying the glory of war. Newsreels lost all semblance of objectivity. Newspapers and magazines began to lose advertising if they carried anti-war articles. A smear campaign was instituted against individuals who opposed intervention. The terms “fifth columnist,” “traitor,” “Nazi,” “anti-Semitic” were thrown ceaselessly at any one who dared to suggest that it was not to the best interests of the United States to enter the war. Men lost their jobs if they were frankly anti-war. Many others dared no longer speak.

Before long, lecture halls that were open to the advocates of war were closed to speakers who opposed it. A fear campaign was inaugurated. We were told that aviation, which has held the British fleet off the continent of Europe, made America more vulnerable than ever before to invasion. Propaganda was in full swing.

There was no difficulty in obtaining billions of dollars for arms under the guise of defending America. Our people stood united on a program of defense. Congress passed appropriation after appropriation for guns and planes and battleships, with the approval of the overwhelming majority of our citizens. That a large portion of these appropriations was to be used to build arms for Europe, we did not learn until later. That was another step.

To use a specific example; in 1939, we were told that we should increase our air corps to a total of 5,000 planes. Congress passed the necessary legislation. A few months later, the administration told us that the United States should have at least 50,000 planes for our national safety. But almost as fast as fighting planes were turned out from our factories, they were sent abroad, although our own air corps was in the utmost need of new equipment; so that today, two years after the start of war, the American army has a few hundred thoroughly modern bombers and fighters–less in fact, than Germany is able to produce in a single month.

Ever since its inception, our arms program has been laid out for the purpose of carrying on the war in Europe, far more than for the purpose of building an adequate defense for America.

Now at the same time we were being prepared for a foreign war, it was necessary, as I have said, to involve us in the war. This was accomplished under that now famous phrase “steps short of war.”

England and France would win if the United States would only repeal its arms embargo and sell munitions for cash, we were told. And then [illegible] began, a refrain that marked every step we took toward war for many months–”the best way to defend America and keep out of war.” we were told, was “by aiding the Allies.”

First, we agreed to sell arms to Europe; next, we agreed to loan arms to Europe; then we agreed to patrol the ocean for Europe; then we occupied a European island in the war zone. Now, we have reached the verge of war.

The war groups have succeeded in the first two of their three major steps into war. The greatest armament program in our history is under way.

We have become involved in the war from practically every standpoint except actual shooting. Only the creation of sufficient “incidents” yet remains; and you see the first of these already taking place, according to plan [ill.]– a plan that was never laid before the American people for their approval.

Men and women of Iowa; only one thing holds this country from war today. That is the rising opposition of the American people. Our system of democracy and representative government is on test today as it has never been before. We are on the verge of a war in which the only victor would be chaos and prostration.

We are on the verge of a war for which we are still unprepared, and for which no one has offered a feasible plan for victory–a war which cannot be won without sending our soldiers across the ocean to force a landing on a hostile coast against armies stronger than our own.

We are on the verge of war, but it is not yet too late to stay out. It is not too late to show that no amount of money, or propaganda, or patronage can force a free and independent people into war against its will. It is not yet too late to retrieve and to maintain the independent American destiny that our forefathers established in this new world.

The entire future rests upon our shoulders. It depends upon our action, our courage, and our intelligence. If you oppose our intervention in the war, now is the time to make your voice heard.

Help us to organize these meetings; and write to your representatives in Washington. I tell you that the last stronghold of democracy and representative government in this country is in our house of representatives and our senate.

There, we can still make our will known. And if we, the American people, do that, independence and freedom will continue to live among us, and there will be no foreign war.

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable,  for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments.  He appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

~ Marcus Tullius Cicero, Roman Statesman, Philosopher and Orator

In 11 days will be the 9th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

Some random facts to consider…

With the Balfour Declaration Britain gave a chunk of Palestine to Rothschild as a gift.

The “City of London” is sovereign Rothschild territory within London.

The British have been invading and causing mayhem in the middle east and Asia for centuries.

Israel is an Anglo-Zionist outpost/foothold/gateway to a region that has been subject to British aggression and control for a long time.

America’s first attack on Muslim lands was on behalf of the British and British Petroleum (Anglo-Iranian Oil). Persian president Mosaddegh was ousted in a coup, by the CIA, at the request of MI6 and replaced with the Anglo friendly Shah of Iran.

On September 12, 2001, when no planes were allowed into US airspace, British officials flew into Washington, DC, to encourage an invasion of Afghanistan.

For the British, this is the FOURTH Anglo war to gain control of that region.

First Anglo-Afghan War 1839-1842

Second Anglo-Afghan War 1878-1880

Third Anglo-Afghan War 1919

October 7, 2001

For the British, another attempt to take Afghanistan would be an impossibility without American blood and money.

On September 11, 2001, the BBC did a live report saying that the Salomon Building (WTC 7) had collapsed, a full half hour BEFORE it did. Unfortunately for the clueless BBC reporter, WTC 7 was standing behind her in the live shot (no doubt she didn’t know one Manhattan skyscraper from another). When BBC London realized the “error”, her feed was cut. CNN did the same.

Sounds like somebody jumped ahead in the SCRIPT.

Britain and Israel are joined at the hip, along with treasonous Anglo-Zionist loyalists in the US government.

It was said after the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq that Tony Blair was Bush’s poodle. I contend the relationship is quite the opposite and that America is the pit bull of the Zionist criminal establishment. Furthermore, were I a detective, I would be taking a very close look at this British-Israeli-US (treasonous) relationship that put US forces right where the British requested they be and how it is that the BBC and CNN knew that WTC 7 would collapse.

Oh, and an aside…

NYC Mayor and Anglophile Michael Bloomberg, has said he wants NYC to be more like London.

Imagine that.